1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes) 1pix.gif (43 bytes)
Action for Airfields - Supporters network helping to support airfields now and for the future Action for Airfields - Supporters network helping to support airfields now and for the future

Search the A4A web

1pix.gif (807 bytes) 1pix.gif (807 bytes)
28/01/02 News
S Cambs Small Airfields Policy Thrown Out
In it's draft Local Plan policy, South Cambridgeshire District Council has sought to implement small airfields policies that "...contain too much prescription and too little flexibility and are more likely to prove to be a millstone than a workable model". This was the consideration given to the Council's plans in the Planning Inspector's report on the first review of the Local Plan.

The Council is attempting to implement  universal 'small airfields policies' which permit it  wide ranging powers over the operation and use of aerodromes in the area. However the Planning Inspector, commenting that the various 'small airfields' vary widely in their individual circumstances, observes that "The material considerations represented by the unique circumstances of the individual site and the particular nature of the proposal would then need to be set against the inflexibility of the policies." Such a situation "...could well give rise to a more lengthy and costly appeal process than if a more neutral policy were to be adopted in the first place" in the Inspector's view.

The report on the Council's small airfield policies concludes with a recommended policy on 'Aviation-related development proposals' in which it is "...intended to provide a flexible framework within which any individual proposal can be considered in the light of all the particular local circumstances."

One hopes that other Councils, such as Surrey and West Sussex Councils, who are also seeking to impose inflexible restrictions on GA in their proposed policies, take note.

As well as Cambridge and Duxford, which were not included in the proposed 'small airfield policies', the district is home to Bourn, Fowlmere, Little Gransden, Gransden Lodge, Little Shelford, Top Farm and Willingham.

In making the case for GA the PFA employed a planner and a brief, expending some 18,000 in the process.

vertline100.gif (88 bytes)
vertline100.gif (88 bytes)
vertline100fade.gif (387 bytes)
If you have any airfield news you would like to share you can contact us via e-mail

Links:-
sm_bull_pdf.jpg (528 bytes)Inspector's report on 1pix.gif (807 bytes)small airfields policy
sm_bull.jpg (515 bytes)PFA
sm_bull.jpg (515 bytes)Surrey alert
sm_bull.jpg (515 bytes)West Sussex alert

Key:-
sm_bull_pdf.jpg (528 bytes)PDF File
sm_bull.jpg (515 bytes)HTML File

More News...

1pix.gif (43 bytes)
lowline.gif (538 bytes)
[ Top of Page ]