|  | The subject of noise generated
        at civil aerodromes was debated
        recently in the House of Commons when Theresa May, MP for Maidenhead, raised the issue in
        relation to the situation at White Waltham. Her specific question was "...whether the
        Government intend to follow their proposal last year to introduce legislation to allow
        local councils to control flights of light aircraft at such airfields." In posing this question a number of themes were
        touched upon, including:- 
          
            |  | Many residents were
            aware of the problem when they moved to the area, but that problems occur when noise
            levels increase; |  
            |  | The difficulties in
            fitting silencers to aircraft has "...been used by many fliers as a smokescreen
            for not doing something about the problem"; |  
            |  | The issue is not
            that the airfield should be closed, but that "Residents need a balance to be
            struck between their needs and the needs of the airfield and its users"; |  
            |  | Nobody has the power
            to enforce any controls other than through the planning system; |  
            |  | White Waltham is not
            designated under section 5 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, therefore current consultative
            arrangements are only voluntary, not statutory. |  In closing, it was stated that the constituents
        of Maidenhead "...feel strongly that powers should be available to enforce
        controls on noise from light aircraft using airfields such as White Waltham." The Minister for Transport Mr John Spellar
        responded by reiterating the policy of successive Governments "...that aircraft
        noise is a local issue that is best resolved locally". The legitimate right of
        general aviation pilots to fly was recognised, but "...that right should always
        be balanced with the interests of the communities that are disturbed by aerodrome
        activities." His statement outlined the Government's
        position on the issues raised earlier, including:- 
          
            |  | The importance of
            general aviation as a legitimate activity; |  
            |  | Aerodrome noise
            abatement procedures and the need for considerate flying; |  
            |  | The need for
            aerodromes to "...consult local amenity groups, local authorities and others
            about decisions that are likely to affect the noise climate"; |  
            |  | When it comes to
            aerodrome alterations and expansion, the role of the local planning authority which "...may
            grant permission, subject to the relevant conditions, which might include noise-related
            requirements..."; |  
            |  | The safety concerns
            of the CAA in the fitting of silencers. |  In conclusion it was stated that "The
        long-standing policy of maintaining a balance between the rights of general aviation
        pilots to fly and the interests of the communities that are disturbed by aircraft noise
        has generally proved successful. Nevertheless, the Government accept that aircraft noise
        can be disturbing and that sometimes more should be done." The Minister for Transport then outlined the
        proposals and expectations presented in the Government consultation paper "The
        control of noise from civil aircraft" as:- 
          
            |  | Providing aerodromes
            with clearer powers to regulate flying behaviour; |  
            |  | The preference for
            local solutions; |  
            |  | New powers for the
            Secretary of State to require an aerodrome to agree a noise amelioration scheme where no
            local solution can be found; |  
            |  | The ability of local
            authorities to enforce such a scheme; |  
            |  | Independent
            arbitration to resolve any disputes that may arise. |  |